Monday, March 30, 2026

Photobiomodulation reduces severe oral mucositis (RR 0.46) and pain (RR 0.35) in head and neck cancer patients

Key Takeaway
Consider photobiomodulation as a supportive intervention to reduce severe oral mucositis and pain in head and neck cancer patients, but interpret findings cautiously due to low evidence certainty.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of photobiomodulation on oral mucositis, oral pain, xerostomia, salivary flow rate, and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. The analysis included 33 articles describing 30 randomized controlled trials, with a total of 1748 patients. The literature search was conducted up to April 2025. Pooled estimates were calculated using a three-level mixed-effects meta-analysis, reporting risk ratios (RR) and standardized mean differences (SMD).

The results demonstrated that photobiomodulation significantly reduced the risk of severe oral mucositis (RR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29-0.71, P<0.001) and the risk of severe oral pain (RR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.23-0.53, P<0.001) when compared with control groups. A significant improvement was also observed for salivary flow rate (SMD 0.75, 95% CI: 0.03-1.46, P=0.044). However, no statistically significant effects were found for xerostomia (SMD -0.07, 95% CI: -0.47-0.33, P=0.646) or quality of life (SMD 1.06, 95% CI: -0.03-2.14, P=0.060). The authors note that the benefits for oral mucositis and quality of life were consistent across different photobiomodulation protocols.

The authors conclude that photobiomodulation appears to be a promising supportive care intervention for reducing severe mucositis and oral pain, while potentially improving salivary flow rates and preserving quality of life. However, they emphasize critical limitations: the certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to low, and most included studies presented a high risk of bias. Therefore, the findings should be interpreted with caution.

View Original Abstract ↓
PURPOSE: To systematically review and analyze the effects of photobiomodulation on oral mucositis, xerostomia, salivary flow rates, oral pain, and quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of six databases was conducted up to April 2025. Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examined the effects of photobiomodulation on the specified outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer. Pooled estimates (risk ratio [RR] and standardized mean difference [SMD]) were calculated using a three-level mixed-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-three articles describing 30 RCTs (n = 1748) were included. Photobiomodulation significantly reduced the risk of severe oral mucositis (RR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.29-0.71, P < 0.001) and severe oral pain (RR 0.35, 95% CI: 0.23-0.53, P < 0.001) compared with controls. Significant improvements were also observed for salivary flow rate (SMD 0.75, 95% CI: 0.03-1.46, P = 0.044). No significant effects were observed on xerostomia (SMD -0.07, 95% CI: -0.47-0.33, P = 0.646) and quality of life (SMD 1.06, 95% CI: -0.03-2.14, P = 0.060). The benefits were consistent across different photobiomodulation protocols for oral mucositis and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Photobiomodulation appears to be a promising supportive care intervention, reducing the risk of severe mucositis and oral pain, while potentially improving salivary flow rates and preserving quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. However, the certainty of the evidence ranged from very low to low and most included studies presented a high risk of bias; therefore, these findings should be interpreted with caution.