Monday, March 30, 2026

Reteplase and non-immunogenic staphylokinase show superior functional outcomes vs alteplase in AIS within 4.5h

Key Takeaway
Consider reteplase (18+18 mg) and non-immunogenic recombinant staphylokinase (10 mg) for potential functional outcome benefits in AIS patients within 4.5 hours.

This systematic review and network meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolytic drugs for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 4.5 hours of onset. The analysis included 21 randomized controlled trials published up to December 12, 2025, involving a total of 16,837 adult patients. The primary efficacy outcomes were 90-day excellent (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0–1) and good (mRS 0–2) functional outcomes. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and all-cause mortality. A frequentist network meta-analysis using a fixed-effect consistency model was conducted, reporting odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For achieving an excellent functional outcome (mRS 0–1), reteplase (18 + 18 mg) showed a statistically significant advantage over alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) (OR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.27–2.02). Non-immunogenic recombinant staphylokinase (10 mg) also demonstrated a statistically significant benefit over the comparator for this outcome (OR 2.23; 95% CI, 1.43–3.48). Reteplase (18 + 18 mg) also improved the likelihood of a good functional outcome (mRS 0–2) compared with alteplase (OR 1.41; 95% CI, 1.08–1.84). Regarding safety, non-immunogenic recombinant staphylokinase significantly reduced the risk of sICH compared with tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg (OR 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11–0.94). No significant differences in 90-day all-cause mortality were observed among the treatments. The authors concluded that within the 4.5-hour treatment window, reteplase (18 + 18 mg) and non-immunogenic recombinant staphylokinase (10 mg) were associated with the highest probabilities of improved functional outcomes.

View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundAlthough several newer thrombolytic agents for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 4.5 h of onset have been developed, their relative efficacy, safety, and optimal dosing remain unclear. A comprehensive comparison across all available agents is therefore needed.MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science for English-language reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to December 12, 2025. Eligible trials enrolled adult AIS patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Primary outcomes were 90-day excellent (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0–1) and good (mRS 0–2) functional outcomes. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and all-cause mortality. A frequentist network meta-analysis using a fixed-effect consistency model was conducted to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsA total of 21 RCTs involving 16,837 patients were included. For achieving mRS 0–1, reteplase (18 + 18 mg) showed a statistically significant advantage over alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) (OR 1.60; 95% CI, 1.27–2.02), and non-immunogenic recombinant staphylokinase (10 mg) demonstrated a statistically significant benefit (OR 2.23; 95% CI, 1.43–3.48). Reteplase (18 + 18 mg) also improved the likelihood of mRS 0–2 compared with alteplase (OR 1.41; 95% CI, 1.08–1.84). For safety, non-immunogenic recombinant staphylokinase significantly reduced sICH risk compared with tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg (OR 0.31; 95% CI, 0.11–0.94). No significant differences in 90-day mortality were observed among treatments.ConclusionWithin the 4.5-h treatment window, reteplase (18 + 18 mg) and non-immunogenic recombinant staphylokinase (10 mg) were associated with the highest probabilities of improved functional outcomes.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251152754.